A practical case-study style walkthrough showing how ChainGuard supports wallet intake, risk review, alerts, cases, and Swiss AML reporting for digital asset teams.
This case-study style example shows how a regulated digital asset team can use ChainGuard to move from a raw wallet address to an auditable compliance review. It is a product workflow example, not a customer claim or legal conclusion.
The team needs to understand whether the wallet has obvious risk indicators, whether any sanctions-aware screening signal is present, how transaction behavior looks, and whether a human review should be opened before the business proceeds.
Without a controlled workflow, analysts may copy screenshots, paste wallet links into notes, and produce inconsistent summaries. That makes later review harder because evidence, rationale, and final disposition are not tied together.
ChainGuard structures the process around screening, risk context, alert handling, case review, and reporting. The goal is to support a human analyst with clear evidence rather than replace the analyst's judgement.
The wallet is stored in a controlled institution workspace so later checks, notes, alerts, and reports remain connected to the same review object.
Risk scoring is designed to surface review drivers such as transaction behavior, sanctions-aware context, counterparty exposure, and operational anomalies without claiming final legal status.
The report gives a structured executive summary, evidence appendix, recommended review actions, and clear language that final decisions remain with trained human reviewers.
The practical value is operational consistency: every wallet review can follow the same path, with the same evidence categories, the same review language, and a clearer route from signal to decision.
| Before ChainGuard | With ChainGuard |
|---|---|
| Wallet links and screenshots stored across separate notes. | Wallet, transactions, risk factors, alerts, and reports stay connected. |
| Review conclusions depend heavily on individual analyst habits. | Structured evidence categories make reviews easier to repeat and compare. |
| Managers need manual explanations for why a wallet was escalated. | Risk drivers and report sections provide a clearer audit trail. |
| API use requires another vendor. | ChainGuard can support application access and API access as the workflow matures. |